Critical perspectives on management and organizations Free Essay Example, 3000 words

In other words; the flame was eating the wall of the booster and the holes were getting bigger now the fire was in the contact of the bottom fuel tank that contained the flammable liquid hydrogen. In 64 seconds, the flame burnt the small hole in the tank as the hydrogen began to burn. In 72 seconds, the hydrogen was pouring from the bottom of the tang and the bottom of the hydrogen tank fell away. The causes of the break-up were many structural flaws. This was the first flight which carried the untrained astronaut. The take-off decision of NASA was a flaw, and the top decision makers’ team was not informed with the critical issues of joints or the impact of the cold weather (Armenakis, 2002; Kramer, 1992: Feynman, 2008). Why groupthink implicated? Two people can think more and therefore it is better to include two people than one in making decisions. Either in university life or at work; people always spend a significant amount of time working in a group effort. Groups can ou tperform individuals because they have potential to bring unique insights, knowledge and skill information. We will write a custom essay sample on Critical perspectives on management and organizations or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page The cause of the disaster was the fault process of decision making, but the top officials were not the only cause of disaster. All of the individuals that were involved in the groupthink were responsible for the challenger catastrophic (Hughes Kumar Moorhead, Ference, & Neck, 1991). What is groupthink? The concept of groupthink was invented by Irving Janis in 1982(Whyte, 1998). Groupthink is the name of the problem that arises in group decision making sometimes. Group think occurs when there is any kind of pressure on the group. This pressure results in reducing and affecting the mental ability and results in carelessness in making ethical judgments. This problem occurs in the case of group cohesiveness in which the importance is given to the desire of group members, rather solve and evaluate the problem rationally.